Financial advice that starts with a plan.
We help you do more with what you’ve earned.
The past few weeks have been quite pivotal for the markets and the global economy. I will talk about the SaaSapocalypse later (the AI revolution is happening in real-time, folks), but today I wanted to talk about the Fed Chair nomination of Kevin Warsh. I think this has a major impact on interest rates, inflation, the markets, and the global economy.
So, let’s get into it.
Who is Kevin Warsh?
I’ll be honest, when President Donald Trump announced his nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Chairman of the Federal Reserve last week, I hardly knew who he was. I remembered the name as a Fed Governor from years ago, but not much else. Assuming he clears Senate confirmation in the weeks ahead, Warsh will become one of the most powerful figures in global finance starting this May. Everyone should know who he is and how he can impact the U.S. economy.
- Warsh is a former Federal Reserve Governor (the youngest ever at the time), serving from 2006 to 2011. He played an important role during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, working closely with then-Chair Ben Bernanke to provide liquidity into the global market. Since leaving the Fed, however, Warsh has been an outspoken critic of the institution, particularly its use of quantitative easing, forward guidance, and what he views as ‘a blurring of monetary and fiscal responsibilities’.
- Warsh is married to Jane Lauder, an heiress to the Estée Lauder fortune. Her father, Ronald Lauder, is a longtime Trump ally and is widely credited with first introducing Trump to the idea of acquiring Greenland.
- After leaving the Federal Reserve in 2011, Warsh worked closely with famed investor Stanley Druckenmiller for more than a decade. For those that don’t know, Druckenmiller is easily one of the Top 5 hedge fund managers of all time. He averaged 30% in annual returns over the past 30 years, with no down years (!!). With Warsh working under him for over a decade, there is no doubt that Druckenmiller’s macroeconomic framework has meaningfully shaped Warsh’s worldview. Why is this important? President Trump asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to lead the search for the next Fed Chair. Bessent was a protege of Druckenmiller’s in the 1990s, creating quite the connection that now places their combined influence at the heart of U.S. monetary and fiscal policy.
The Economic Plan
Why is this connection important? The Treasury Secretary (Scott Bessent) is responsible for managing the national debt and collecting taxes. The Federal Reserve (presumably Kevin Warsh) controls the U.S. money supply and sets interest rates to steer the economy. The two organizations are extremely important to the U.S. economy and markets, and they obviously influence each other.
Bessent has frequently outlined the Administration’s “3-3-3” plan—3% growth, 3% deficit, 3M barrels/day increase. (As a side note, if you want a better understanding of the Trump Administration’s economic strategy, I highly recommend listening/watching to this podcast episode.)
The number one priority for Bessent is to manage our enormous debt load, currently $38T. Last year, interest payments ($1.13T) exceeded defense spending ($1.125T) for the first time ever. Bessent would love to lower interest rates so he can ‘refinance’ a big portion of this debt and help keep these payments under control.
To do this, he needs the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates. This is where things get complicated. The Federal Reserve is designed (for good reason) to be completely independent, free from political pressure. The Federal Reserve has a dual mandate (only): maximum employment and stable prices (low inflation).
On one hand, it is quite appealing to lower our interest payments, creating a more balanced budget. And lord knows we need to reduce our deficit. On the other hand, the Federal Reserve needs to maintain its autonomy. The independence is meant to prevent politicians from forcing lower interest rates that can boost the economy before elections, thereby triggering inflation. This leaves policymakers with a difficult balancing act.
With $38 trillion in debt, higher interest rates make government finances harder to manage. But cutting rates too early risks reigniting inflation. Continuing down the same path means bigger budget deficits and a growing debt balance. There is no easy solution. Every decision involves a tradeoff. History shows us just how important the Fed’s independence is. During the 1970s, the Fed faced significant political pressure, leading to an era of high inflation and economic instability. And look at nations where there is no separation between those in charge and their central bank. The Fed needs to maintain its independence.
Bessent + Warsh: How This Can Impact Markets
First, understand that interest rates influence everything. Stock valuations, bonds, real estate, private markets, and even hiring decisions. As Milton Friedman conveyed, “The Fed can wipe out or create millions of jobs with a few bad decisions.”
Based on what Warsh and Bessent have been saying over the past few years, the implied strategy is as follows.
Smaller Balance Sheet
Warsh has stated repeatedly, for years, that he would like to shrink the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. The Federal Reserve currently has $6.6T in total assets (sitting on its balance sheet). The Fed never really held significant assets like this until the 2008 Great Financial Crisis. It only ramped up its purchases during COVID.
By reducing the balance sheet, Quantitative Tightening (QT), the Fed would let Treasury bonds mature. This would theoretically raise longer-term rates. This practice is highly anti-inflationary, as it puts pressure on the economy and slows it down.
Cut Interest Rates
Cutting interest rates, as everyone already knows, is a tailwind for economic growth. If left unchecked, the economy would run too hot, leading to high inflation. However, lower rates would also lower borrowing costs, allowing the Fed to refinance some of its debt into lower-rate bonds.
The Two Combined
At first glance, QT and cutting interest rates sound contradictory. Yes, QT can slow the economy, while rate cuts can stimulate it. But QT will only impact long-term rates (raising them), while cutting interest rates will affect only the short-term rates. Picture the yield curve as a see-saw in your mind; the long end rising and the short end falling. Consider what this means for your own mortgage rate in the next few years: will it climb with long-term rates, or fall like short-term ones? In this scenario, we will be left with an economy where credit becomes cheaper, small businesses can breathe more, and inflation expectations will fall.
So, basically, what this looks like is that Warsh and Bessent are going to try to engineer a controlled slowdown that keeps inflation contained while lowering our national debt interest payments.
If this works, stocks and other risk assets can continue to perform well. But, of course, this is not guaranteed.
The Risks
If long-term interest rates rise too much under QT, housing, commercial real estate, and business investment could slow sharply. If short-term rates are cut too quickly, inflation could reaccelerate. And if investors begin to doubt the Federal Reserve’s independence, long-term rates could rise regardless of policy intentions.
In other words, there is a narrow path here. History shows that central banks rarely get this kind of balancing act exactly right.
What This Means for Your Portfolio
We ultimately don’t know what Warsh and Bessent (and Trump) plan to do with the world’s largest and most important economy. But we need to think this through to better understand the risks and opportunities. Plus, don’t underestimate the fact that things like this almost always play out differently than we all think they will. A bit of humility can go a long way.
Staying disciplined, of course, is the most important attribute you can have in an environment like this. And understanding that time in the market is far more important than timing the market. Make sure you are well allocated and that your ‘risk’ is accounted for. Understand that over time, a disciplined, well-designed portfolio will matter far more than any individual policy decision.
